District 9

Saturday, August 15th, 2009 @ 3:09 am | Movies

Before the movie started, my friend Mark related the story of working in Los Angeles and getting passes to be in preview screenings of movies. This is a shared experience many of us have. I saw Back to the Future and Legend and a few other movies in test screenings when I was a kid.

He describes seeing a movie called Valentine having no earthly idea what kind of movie it was going to be, nothing except the title, and so when the first scarey moment happened, he almost shit himself. The movie, he explained, wasn’t very good and wasn’t that scary once he knew what he was in for. But not knowing, that first moment was among the scariest he ever experienced.

I think I probably would have liked District 9 more if I knew literally nothing about what I was going to see when I sat down. This is, however, not an experience we often have. TV, mostly, is our only avenue for that kind of discovery, that kind of tabula rasa experience. I was reading a retro-article from the early 1980s about the advent of the “remote control” culture and “channel surfing” and how degenerate it seemed to the people who were adults at the time. Like their kids had some sort of disorder because they’d change the channel every second. But that experience has a lot to recommend it. You come across some amazing shit when you have 0 expectations and judge the work purely on your reaction to it with no marketing between you and the authors. Often showing up in the middle, without any backstory. The movie didn’t begin in media res but your version of it did.

Someone stumbling across District 9 as they channel surfed (a dying experience, I believe, with the advent of the DVR) would probably have their mind blown. I, however, did not. I knew what the movie was about and so was a little disappointed.

It’s hard to criticize this movie if you know how it was made. The whole thing looks like a $120 million movie, but cost only $30 mil. When you know that, you tend to give it some slack. It’s damned impressive for thirty million. What a cop out, huh? Damned by faint praise.

The main failing of the film is the completely lack of anyone to give a shit about, except maybe the aliens. Every single human character in the film is a worthless piece of shit. I’m not sure, maybe that’s the point of the film. When you know you’re in for a movie about a bunch of aliens in a ghetto in Johannesburg, you expect some subtext, some political allegory, but it’s hard to get any kind of meaning from a film that paints all its characters with such relentlessly bleak negativity. “Turns out, we’re all bastards?” Well, that’s a kind of dead-end, isn’t it?

Allow me to give an example. When the main character, obviously ill, disoriented, staggering around, vomits blue goop onto his own party cake, the party-goers–his friends and family–just watch. For quite a while. And frown at him. Not a single person at the party, including his wife, suggests or even implies that maybe someone should call an ambulance. Imagine John Hurt writhing on the table in Alien, the chest-burster rupturing through his sternum in some twisted nightmarish version of birth, and everyone else just standing around watching, not helping, turning to each other and commenting “what an asshole.” That’s the kind of human we’re dealing with here.

There’s a moment when the Head Evil Mercenary Dude looks around in the middle of a firefight during which all sorts of crazy alien shit has happened,  points to an alien he’s captured and says: “that guy knows what’s going on.”

He’s right. He’s absolutely correct. It is literally the only time in the movie any human being displays even an ounce of sense or insight. Everyone else is a worthless doosh, or an evil mastermind or an evil worthless masterdoosh.

A lot of the movie, like The Matrix, seemed to think that storytelling wasn’t necessary since they’d already decided they were going to make people one dimensional and trot out some cliches. “Listen,” the movie says. “You know that bit where no one believes him and his girlfriend abandons him and he’s all alone, right? So we don’t have to mess around with that do we? Here’s a phone call from her, you know what she’s going to say, so we’re just going to kind of say it quick and move on. Just imagine there was a whole relationship there you belived in and which just fell apart, ok? We’ve got some robots to fire up.”

We don’t know enough about his wife and their relationship to give a shit either way, which is probably for the best because this movie has such a dim fucking opinion of the human race, if we learned any more about her we’d probably end up hating her too. You know the stereotype of Dick Cheney as the evil mastermind? Well, imagine if A: he really was that guy and B: he took his lesbian daughter whom his party’s platform demands he abjure and instead of coming out in support of her, put her in a blender, juiced her, and drank her. Then he’d be all of the main bad guys of this movie.

A man may smile and smile and be a villain. Yes. But apparently in the future he can just be a villain and bypass the smiling part.

We’ve come full circle somewhat. Peter Coyote’s character from E.T. didn’t want to cut the little alien open and feast on his floppily-doppilies. The only reason Eliot thinks he’s going to do that is because Eliot’s head is filled with old SF where the bad guys always want to dissect the local aliens. Coyote’s character has to explain that in fact they’re trying to save E.T. Indeed, if we look back at the movie, all Eliot did was keep the sick alien away from the only people who had a chance of making him well again.

In District 9, everyone is either A: an idiot, or B: exactly the people Eliot thought Peter Coyote’s character was. It’s the 1950s all over again. They want to juice the aliens, they want to steal what the aliens have, they want to profit from it, they want to exploit them and each other and will destroy anyone and anything, heedless of any consequence to do it. Shit, watch the original Day The Earth Stood Still, we’re way worse now in District 9 than any humans were back then.

If these were two dimensional characters, that would be great. I have a great fondness for 2 dimensional characters. These guys are barely 1 dimensional. The only thing they’re missing is mustaches to twirl and blonds to leave tied up on railroad tracks. It’s dangerous to generalize. Does this movie just happen, by co-incidence, to feature nothing but worthless humans? Or is it just South Africans? Or is it everyone? Fuck you, either way.

In a sense, District 9′s South Africa is where All Starship Captains But Kirk come from in the original Trek. They’re either criminally incompetent, or actually evil, or both. Or Kirk.

The main character is something of a cipher for every fucked-up dysfunctional character ever. He’s a groveling sycophant, an inept bureaucrat, a bloodless coward, and a sociopathic bully. He’s so irredeemable the only way he’s able to get even a little perspective on the horror of the reality he’s lived with for 20 years is by being literally turned into one of the aliens. Only then does he seem to entertain the notion that, hey, maybe these guys aren’t so bad. But then, the entire rest of the cast is trying to gun him down, run him over, and blow him up all at once so it may just be that he likes the aliens because they’re the only ones not trying to kill him.

The action sequences and special effects are top notch. It’s hard for me to get behind the acting because the actors are given such weird characters to play. There is a WHOLE LOT of Chekov’s Gun in this movie such that you almost need a score card to keep track of every critical plot element and coincidence they mention in the first act so that, upon trotting them out in the third act you’ll know what’s going on. Get ready, because I’m about to praise Die Hard again

You know, when John McClane learns about making fists with his toes, it’s in service to a scene that tells us he doesn’t like to fly. So if he doesn’t like to fly, what’s so important that would make him overcome that? Oh, his wife. And their relationship is on the rocks. All that from fists with your toes. That’s tight plotting. In District 9 it’s fists with your toes now, so that in an hour and fifteen minutes he can punch people with his toe-fists. That’s it. These data points we’re given aren’t in service to anything. The alien weapons can only be fired by the aliens. That’s it, no further exposition, no insight into why that might be or what it says about the aliens, because it doesn’t say anything about them. The Nigerians want the alien weapons even though they can’t use them, for no reason, no insight there into the Nigerians or anyone else. They’re only important because the plot needs them later.

I realized pretty quickly that I didn’t want to see the movie they were showing me. As the main character drives around District 9 alternatively being afraid of and brutalizing the aliens, I thought “Oh. It’s this then, is it? I want to learn some more about the aliens.” They just aired Alien Nation on SciFi and I had one of those moments where I felt certain they were deliberately trying to remind us of a current-movie’s roots, by showing the stuff that inspired it. And when Alien Nation came out, I was impressed, but only because I thought it was going to be crap. It’s actually pretty good. Better, I think, than this movie and at least part of that is the view into the alien’s culture and lives, almost none of which we get here. What were they doing on that ship? Why did it stop working

I’m not saying the movie had to answer those questions, nothing could be further from the truth, I’m just saying that I’d rather have learned about that, than get the story I got. You know, I didn’t like the bit in Footfall where the journalists turn out to be so blinded by their quest for a story that they will betray the human race’s plans for a counter-attack to the alien invaders, I thought it was just the authors hating journalists and putting their hate into the book. But at least it was a point of view. It was a statement about something, even though I didn’t like the statement, it was well-done.

It sounds like I hated this movie and I usually don’t come in and say “I liked it” or “I hated it,” because I think that’s lazy. But I do want to say “it’s not as bad as I make it sound.” You don’t really think about a lot of these things while you’re watching the movie, because it moves so fast. And every time they use the POP gun on the humans, no matter how many times they do it, everyone in the audience goes “AAUGH!

Seeing that, you tend to forget that District 9′s Johannesburg is populated entirely by Original Trek Non-Kirk Starship Captains.

Popularity: unranked [?]

 

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Recently

  • Rebuilding the Network, A Manifesto
  • INCEPTION
  • Predators
  • The A-Team
  • My Novel, Again
  • Robin Hood
  • Iron Man2
  • Farvel, Taarna the Valkyrie
  • The Book
  • It’s the IP, Stupid
  •  

    9 Responses to “District 9”

    1. Jason Says:

      I just got back from watching this and, yes, it is not as bad as this post makes it out to be.

      Would I like more characterization and, possibly, someone I could care about in the movie?  Sure.

      Also, it wasn’t just the Nigerians that irrationally wanted all of the non-functional alien tech. Everyone in government/business wanted it too, for the inevitable day that someone would get it to work. Sort of like a having an arms race while waiting for someone to figure out how plutonium works.

    2. Joe Says:

      Matt,
      While I’ve been a silent reader of yours ever since wickedthought pointed me towards squaremans on his lj, this is the first time I’ve ever found myself fundamentally disagreeing with a post of ours.I think one of the primary genius of the movie is that there isn’t anyone in it to care about.  They are just people. Not super heroes, not villains, just normal people trying to deal with a massive social problem that has no "good" solutions to it. As far as the characters being only one-dimensional, I would say that they are more pre-existing modern archetypes, in which the director hoped the viewer would already intrinsically "know" and thus he didn’t have to spend the first half of the movie hand holding his viewer through every character’s back story.  It’s like your comment in a previous entry about Indy Jones not needing to explain out loud why he knows not to look at the Ark of the Covenant.
      Perhaps it’s my career path of government employment, but I’ve met and know people like the characters in this movie. It’s not that these people are 1 dimensional.  It’s that they really are just boring. The "bureaucratic social worker" worn down into a near automaton dealing with the crushing poverty and seemingly endless and hopeless situations.  The "grizzled veteran soldier" who’s stared into the eyes of the devil and liked what he saw. The "National Security Czar" who very easily chooses to sacrifice one person to potentially unlock the greatest scientific secret of human history, how to operate the Alien’s technology.  The "Nigerian warlord" who is trying to "devour their power" seems outlandishly bizarre, until you read something like this http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/107036097535.htm

      The truly compelling portion of this movie is when it takes these "painfully normal" characters and dumps them in the middle of this speculative fiction. To watch the bureaucrat awaken to understand the "Other" he supposedly helps on a daily basis (through the classic SF trope of turning him into the Other)" The scene where the grizzled war veteran looked around the horrific carnage that he had witness via the alien’s weaponry, and decides he’s going to prevent that from ever happening again.
      Don’t get me wrong, there were several plot holes that I felt could have been handled differently.  I understand the director’s vision of creating a "refugee crisis" situation, but the completely collapse of the alien’s social structure was poorly handled. The themes of the strong preying off the weak by the inclusion of the Nigerian Criminal Syndicate was absurdly and powerfully shaken by the selling of "useless" alien weapons to them.  The scene should have gone something like "Prawn walks in in Exoarmor, zaps and kills one mook, and demands all the cat food from the surviving Nigerians". That a "Prawn Mafia" for lack of better term didn’t evolve out of the situation seemed implausible to me.
      My last plot point that strained my sense of plausibility was that after 20 years, "Chris" finally gets enough "fluid" to "save everyone" on the same day the relocation plan starts up.

      Something no one else has commented on that I thought I "caught" was that the main character’s father-in-law was setting him up. He knew that there was no way the "relocation" would go well, so he set up his "not good enough for his daughter" son to be the fall guy who’d take the blame for "violating the prawn’s civil rights".  As for one last point, the scene with the surprise party and being sick, since the director chose to shoot the "climax" of that scene from a weird first person/third person/first person perspective, I got much more of a "stunned horror" than a "callously indifferent" reaction.  And again, we know someone calls an ambulance, cause the next scene he’s waking up in the hospital.

      All that being said, I found District 9 to be perhaps one of the most thought provoking "speculative" fiction to be released in the last couple of years. I will own it on DVD when it comes out, which is high praise from me.

    3. Hyrum Says:

      I’m pretty sure the Nigerians wanted the alien tech because their leader was eating alien bits in an effort to use the tech at some point.

    4. Tony T Says:

      I practice the art of "non-prescience". Most movies are more enjoyable for me when I know nothing beforehand. Even seeing a brief glimpse of a trailer can give your brain enough to pick at once you’re watching the movie. If I’ve seen a trailer, I’ll notice my thoughts trying to "look ahead" — to piece the puzzle together. This very process is distracting from the enjoyment — it’s one way that suspension of disbelief is broken. I enjoy movies and games the most when I don’t start peering into the cracks; thinking outside the presented setting.

      It is difficult to know nothing of a movie before sitting down to see it — there is significant budget allocated to ensuring I’ve seen the highlights. And how can I know whether I want to see a particular title? It’s a similar problem with books (oh, I don’t read the back or overleaf unless I’ve read the book). The title often plays a role, unfortunately. Better hints are from friends who recommend a movie, or hints by comparison or categorization… "if you liked that, you might like this".

      I haven’t seen District 9. And now it’s spoiled for me by seeing this mammoth mothership plastered on your front page, thanks. :P

    5. Dalmatian Twills Says:

      Me, I waited reading Matthew’s piece until I’d seen the movie, and now that I have – well, I basically agree with him. Yeah, Matthew, you captured many of my problems with this movie. I have some small personal gripes in addition. For instance, how the Nigerians were presented bothered me on a personal level. They were, on the whole, too close to the old image of the frenzied black savages for me not to feel discomfort. That could just be me having the Swedish equivalence of a liberal guilt trip, and for what I know the real Nigerian mafia may very well look and act just like that. It did take me out of the picture though.Also, a little thing, the small segment after the combat walker clears out the room with the captured bullets, you know when the Big Boss Nigerian gets something stuck to his head, which then explodes. The little pause between attachment and detonation made the scene too gratuituos for me; it jarred with the detached tone of the rest of the movie.I didn’t like the movie. I wanted to, but I couldn’t. I’m impressed by much of it, but ultimately it left me cold.

    6. Matthew Matthew Says:

      I watched the original Get Carter and I turned to my friend Mark and said "This movie has a pretty bad attitude toward women!" He replied; "That’s your sexism showing. It has a bad attitude toward *everyone*." He was right, no one in Get Carter is any damned good. Ditto D9. The Nigerians are just as 1-dimensional as everyone else, it just makes us more uncomfortable when we see minorities treated that way. When it’s the White Guy, we’re ok with it. I am, at least.

      We never learn enough about the Nigerians to care what they want or why, beyond "the alien tech" and "because it’s alien tech." Painting them so cartoonily makes us uncomfortable because that 1-dimensional attitude is one we’ve seen before.

    7. Dalmatian Twills Says:

      I am a longtime fan of white South African villains. Joss Ackland’s evil diplomate in Lethal Weapon 2 is a classic.  Yeah, my problem is when media hopfeully unwittingly steps too close to some of the classic old racist imageries.It was in a way how I felt when I played the game Witcher. There’s a bad guy in the beginning who looked a whole lot like the illustrations that were in the copy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion that I found at an old and slightly evil relative. All probably very innocent, but it gives me bad associations. (Didn’t stop me from continuing the game though. Sunk costs and all that. )Let’s see if there are any paragraphs this time, eh.

    8. Mr Teufel Says:

      I basically agree with Joe. The protagonist in <i>District 9</i> reminds me of many protagonists of European comics published in the old magazine <i>Heavy Metal</i>. As for the prawns forming their own mafia – they’re aliens. We know nothing of their social instincts or the social structure they had before becoming dispossessed.

      I liked that so little about the aliens was explained. It helped me buy into the verisimilitude of the whole thing, as did the wonderful effects that made it near impossible to tell what was cgi and what was model or practical work.

    9. Sean Holland Says:

      You sum up nicely my problems with the humans as presented in District 9.  It was not that they were nasty, I have no problem with that, it was that <I>everyone</I> was nasty and stupid to boot.  And it was the stupid that really got me.  In 20 years, the entire scientific community of <B>Earth</B> could not reverse engineer a single piece of alien tech?  Where were the scientific teams climbing all over the mothership trying to pry the secret of how it <i>just floated there</i> and, I do not know, maybe the <i>secret of interstellar travel</i>.  Nah.  No one would want that, not when you could have explody-shooty weapons, that is much more important.  Right?

      And if the aliens could use their weapons, why not recruit aliens into your military?  All the cat food you can eat, just zapsome people for us.  If it was as addictive for the aliens as implied . . .

      I thought Alien Nation dealt with similar themes much more effectively for all of the limitations of 1980s FX and storytelling.  Ultimately, I thought that District 9 failed to take its subject and background seriously.

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>